T: 01273 761 990 E: info@helix-law.com

Commercial, Employment and Property Solicitors

NOTE: This website uses cookies.

By browsing this website or dismissing this banner you are consenting to their use. Learn more

I understand

Cookies Policy

We use cookies on our website. By using our website you agree to this Policy and you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with the terms of this Policy.

About Cookies

A cookie is a small file which asks permission to be placed on your computer’s hard drive. Once you agree, the file is added and the cookie helps analyse web traffic or lets you know when you visit a particular site. Cookies allow web applications to respond to you as an individual. The web application can tailor its operations to your needs, likes and dislikes by gathering and remembering information about your preferences.

There are two main kinds of cookies: “session” cookies and “persistent” cookies. Session cookies only last for the duration of users using the website and are deleted from your computer when you close your browser, whereas persistent cookies outlast user sessions and remain stored on your computer until deleted, or until they reach their expiry date.

Cookies on this Website

We use Session Cookies and Persistent Cookies on this website.

We use cookies for the following purposes:

  • to recognise your computer when you visit our website;
  • to improve the website’s usability;
  • to administer this website.

Generally, we use cookies to help us administer this website, to improve the website’s usability. We may also use cookies to identify which pages are being used. This helps us analyse data about web page traffic and improve our website in order to tailor it to customer needs. We only use this information for statistical analysis purposes and then the data is removed from the system.

Overall, cookies help us provide you with a better website, by enabling us to monitor which pages you find useful and which you do not.

Cookies do not contain any information that personally identifies you, a cookie in no way gives us access to your computer or any information about you.

We are committed to ensuring that your information is secure. In order to prevent unauthorised access or disclosure we have put in place suitable physical, electronic and managerial procedures to safeguard and secure the information we collect on-line.

You can choose to accept or decline cookies. Most web browsers automatically accept cookies, but you can usually modify your browser setting to decline cookies if you prefer. This may prevent you from taking full advantage of the website.

Third Party Cookies

When you use our website, you may also be sent third party cookies.

Third party cookies may be used for the following purposes:

  • to track your browser across multiple websites;
  • to build a profile of your web surfing;
  • to target advertisements which may be of particular interest to you.

In addition, we use Google Analytics to analyse the use of this website. Google Analytics generates statistical and other information about website use by means of cookies, which are stored on users' computers.  The information generated relating to our website is used to create reports about the use of the website. Google will store and use this information. Google's privacy policy is available at www.google.com/privacypolicy.html.

Most browsers allow you to reject all cookies, whilst some browsers allow you to reject just third party cookies.

This website cookies policy is based on a free document supplied by The Legal Stop Limited through its website www.thelegalstop.co.uk.

An unenforceable non-compete clause does not later become enforceable, even if circumstances change

If a non-compete clause is unreasonable, and therefore unenforceable when the employment contract is signed, it does not later become enforceable if circumstances later change making it reasonable, the High Court has ruled.

In 2000, an employee was recruited at a salary of £35,000, and his employment contract required him to give one month's notice if he left. It also contained a non-compete clause to the effect that he could not work for a competitor within 12 months of leaving.

In 2005, following various promotions, he signed a variation of his terms of employment stating his new salary to be £80,000 and increasing his notice period to three months, but otherwise stating that "all other terms and conditions outlined in my original documentation remain unchanged".

In April 2012, he gave three months' notice that he was leaving to work for a competitor. His employer summarily dismissed him and applied for an injunction to stop him working for the competitor for 12 months, relying on the non-compete clause.

A non-compete clause is not legally enforceable unless it is reasonable. Whether or not it is reasonable should, under current law, be decided by reference to the circumstances at the time it was entered into.

The employee argued that when the non-compete clause had been entered into, a 12-month prohibition against working for a competitor was unreasonable given his relatively junior status. The employer countered that his acknowledgement in 2005 (that terms and conditions in the original documentation remained unchanged) meant the non-compete clause was agreed to afresh and, given his seniority at that time, the 12-month prohibition was reasonable and enforceable.

The High Court ruled that if a non-compete clause is unreasonable and therefore unenforceable at the time it is entered into, that is the end of the matter. The fact that the clause would have been reasonable if the employee had agreed to it at some later date, when his circumstances had changed, does not mean it is then revived or resurrected as on that date. That the employee had agreed his 'original terms and conditions remain unchanged' did not help the employer because, under that wording, a term or condition that was ineffective and unenforceable in the original documentation remained so.

This case would have been easier to enforce if the employee had affirmed it before they left. For more information on that, please read this blog.


Employers should review the reasonableness of non-compete and similar clauses every time an employee's duties change and/or they are promoted, to ensure they remain enforceable in the new circumstances. If in doubt, the employee should be asked to agree to new clauses.

Case ref: PAT Systems v Neilly [2012] EWHC 2609 (QB)

Need to make tough HR Decisions? We can help. click here to see our HR Retainer Service

Or contact us for a 30 minute free initial appraisal


Jonathan Waters
is the founder of Helix Law. Before qualifying as a Solicitor he worked in industry and in investment banking for over a decade. He was also the Partner in charge of Commercial Litigation, Employment Law and Property Litigation at Stephen Rimmer LLP. Jonathan has wide experience of helping and advising businesses to avoid or to deal with commercial disputes and in particular construction disputes. 


This article is written to raise awareness of the issues it discusses and it may not be updated after it is first written, even if the law changes. It is not intended to be legal advice and cannot be relied on as such. Helix Law is not responsible or liable for any action taken or not taken as a result of  this article. If you think the matters set out affect you and you wish to apply them to your particular circumstances then we are happy to give you free initial telephone advice. 

Contact Helix Law on 01273 761 990 or email info@helix-law.com

T: 01273 761 990
E: info@helix-law.com

Helix LawHelix Law Limited is a limited liability company registered in England and Wales. Registration Number 07845461. A list of Directors is available for inspection at the Registered Office: 1 Frederick Terrace, Brighton, BN1 1AX. Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.